Thursday, April 21, 2011

Mining Our Wildlife

As I drove slowly on a winter morning on the dusty roads of Dandeli-Anshi Tiger Reserve a set of pugmarks revealed that a tiger had ambled along the track. The pug marks looking brilliant in the soft morning light enthralled me. About thirteen years ago I was witness to giant tippers filled with iron ore speeding on these same roads ensuring near decimation of large-bodied wildlife from this are. This reserve was mining precincts till the late 90s when a land mark Supreme Court judgment ordered the stoppage of all non-forestry activities within protected areas. Wildlife is slowly recovering in Dandeli-Anshi though other depletive factors continue to endanger this high potential area for tiger and its prey.

Several mines operated within Dandeli Wildlife Sanctuary in the mid 90s. Pic:Sanjay Gubbi

Karnataka that holds the largest iron ore reserves anywhere in the country has pillaged ecologically sensitive areas in the Western Ghats for several decades. Iron ore mining and quarrying for granite has taken a severe toll in key wildlife habitats. This has resulted in disastrous effects through habitat fragmentation, especially for those species that require large home ranges and are sensitive to disturbances. Tigers, elephants, dholes, lion-tailed macaques, great pied hornbill to name a few such species. These animals are fussy about where and how they live.

Mining brings all those activities that are against the interests of protecting wildlife. Roads are cut opening up fragile ecosystems for human intrusion. Large-scale human settlements are set up in forests for labour force and other staff, further fragmenting and degrading habitats.

Other developmental essentials such as power lines that bring in electricity, pipelines that carry semi-finished products to nearest ports are all imperative to wildlife. These linear structures break continuous tree canopies for several kilometers restricting tree dwelling species to smaller forest fragments. This limits their access to food sources in other areas of the forest. Another effect is inbreeding due to genetic separation resulting in weak or sterile offsprings. Species such as the lion-tailed macaque, a highly endangered Western Ghats endemic with fewer than 4,000 surviving in the wild, are the ones severely affected by linear fragmentation.

Impact on hydrology

Surface mining industry is a farmer’s nightmare primarily affecting eastward flowing rivers that water the fields in the southern plateau. It changes hydrological profile of an area by degrading catchments affecting both quantity and quality of water. It increases run-offs during monsoons and pollutes rivers and streams that take birth from these rolling hills. Mining has heavily polluted Tunga, Bhadra, Kali in Karnataka, with Selaulim, Mandovi, Zuari and other rivers meeting similar fate in Goa. Roads cut within mining concessions tearing the fragile hillsides exposes the area for erosion taking mud directly into nearby streams and rivers further contributing to siltation.

Reservoirs built with billions of rupees of public money are clogged with mine silt decreasing their water holding capacity. Colossal waste of tax payer’s money for a few thousand dollars of forex the mining industry brings back to the country’s economy. Studies by Jagadish Krishnaswamy of Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and Environment in collaboration with Wildlife Conservation Society-India Program showed that over 50 percent of silt load in Bhadra dam was from mining activities carried out in Kudremukh National Park. Interestingly the mine area formed less than one percent of the total catachment area of the River Bhadra against which the dam was built.

The Kudremukh saga

Halting of mining in Kudremukh has become the poster boy of conservation success stories in the country. Perhaps it’s the best example of blend of legal intervention and outreach success in the history of wildlife conservation movement in the country.

Kudremukh is one of the few rainforest habitats where tigers still survive. Apart from tigers, the dark green stunted rainforests called sholas, which play a critical role in water regulation, interspersed with lush green grasslands that turn golden in summer are also the largest block of lion-tailed macaque habitat in the country depicting its biological importance. A public sector mining company ravaged these rainforests for over three decades for iron ore. However based on an order from the Supreme Court, in response to a public interest litigation filed by Wildlife First a conservation NGO, mining was halted in the end of 2005.


In Kudremukh National Park the mining company carried out open cast mining right above the birth place of River Bhadra. Pic: Niren Jain

The company still holds on to the land and advocates reopening the mine in this fragile national park. Eco-tourism being one of their favorite selling points to clasp on to the land. The company spends nearly 60 crore rupees annually in upkeeping the plant, machinery and employees knowing well that they are violating the court’s order. While the mining company continues to violate the order and pillage public funds, nature is set to return to the mined area. Mined slopes are swathed with green moss, a sign of regeneration and hope. However it will take a few decades before the area could return to its original vegetation. Or perhaps it never will, but the large-scale disturbance and pollution caused by the mine has ended.

The mining company has dumped mining waste called as tailings inside the national park submerging 340 ha of pristine forests and grasslands. In the year 2000 the pipeline carrying slurry to Mangalore port broke releasing about 4,000 tonnes of iron ore slurry heavily polluting the streams and rivers. This was not the first such instance.


Water coming out of mining area (left) and water from pristine forests. Pic: Shekar Dattatri

Other areas

Not far from Kudremukh, the hills of Kemmangundi were plundered by another public sector for over 70 years till 2003 when the company shut shop with the expiry of their lease. With an average rainfall of 2,400 mm the mine constantly polluted Somavahini and Hebbehalla two important tributaries of River Bhadra. Even today several species of amphibians and fishes that are new to science are discovered in the rivers and streams that stumble down the hills of Kudremukh, Kemmangundi and other forests in the Western Ghats. These species could have been lost forever if the mining had continued.

Many other parts of the Western Ghats have been blighted by mining and quarrying bringing irreversible changes to wildlife habitats. Black granite quarrying in the Male Mahadeshwara hills threatens an all important elephant corridor between the wet and dry zones of the Ghats. Currently a total of 26 mining leases have been granted in Ponnachi, Meenyam and Martalli, an indication of reckless economic development planning.

Beyond Western Ghats, forest remnants in the dry districts of Bellary, Tumkur, Chitradurga, Koppal, Bangalore are all seeing their last days due to the plundering for iron ore and granite. Four-horned antelope, possibly chinkara, leopards, hyenas, sloth bears, wolves, elephants are losing their turf to mainly feed the Chinese dragon.


Nationwide mines continue to bulldoze tiger and other wildlife habitats. Panna Tiger Reserve that has one of the two legal diamond mines in the country, acted as one of the most critical depletive factors for losing all its tigers. Sariska that had marble mines met with similar fate in 2004. Threat of iron ore mining looms over the buffer area of Bandipur Tiger Reserve while coal mining intimidates the buffer of Tadoba-Andhari Tiger Reserve. The last habitat of the Asiatic lions in Gir could be lost to limestone mining and salt mining in Rann of Kutch has put the only remaining population of Indian wild ass in peril. Several other forest lands in Jharkhand, Chattisgarh, Orissa are facing the brunt of both legal and illegal mining activities. Two districts in Goa have 100 mining leases with both these districts having 65 percent forest cover.

As our country grows economically richer, we are growing biologically poorer. Policy makers seem to be inattentive to the call of conservationists about the connection of forests and wildlife to watershed and further to poverty alleviation. Though important for economic development exploitation of natural resources should follow a hands-off approach in ecologically sensitive areas if species such as tigers and lion-tailed macaques have to see through this century. However it needs strong political commitment and active engagement by those managing our wildlife habitats.

An edited version of this article was published in The Hindu Survey of the Environment


Thursday, April 14, 2011

The numbers game

Threats to tigers need to be reduced if there numbers has to increase. Pic:Kalyan Varma

Have the tiger numbers increased since the last Government figures were put out in 2008? Answer to which was out under full media glare two weeks ago. ‘Tigers bounce back’ cried a news paper on the cover page the next day. There were many responses to this. Many jumped to claim credit to the positive results including a few media houses. Sadly few saw the results in a pragmatic, scientific manner. Do we really have higher numbers now? A closer scrutiny reveals that the results may not be big as hyped by the media.

Results of wildlife studies are not as simple and straight forward to interpret. In fact small changes, 16 per cent in this case, do not make big differences. All wildlife including tigers will have minor fluctuations in numbers when compared over years. These variations depend upon various factors including the season of data collection, mortalities and so on.

To give an exponential increase it is important to note that during the last published estimate results areas such as Sunderbans, North East India were left out. Additionally new areas such as Sahyadri Tiger Reserve have been added to the estimation results. Hence adding numbers from these areas will only depict an expansion of the sites studied rather than real increase in numbers.

Some, including renowned tiger biologist Dr.K.Ullas Karanth have raised basic questions. He has outlined the deficiencies in the methodology including lack of scientific rigour and importantly he has questioned the lack of published results in peer-reviewed journals from the previous exercise. Only one publication has been published from the previously carried out estimates. Karanth advocates more intensive, annual, source site population estimations rather than a country-wide four year estimates.

Priority for conservation

Union minister Salman Khurshid rightly said at the tiger estimate release that “we came late on industrial revolution and need to ensure that a balance is maintained between development and environment”. He is so right. We need not commit blunders which western countries committed during their industrial revolution. Most industrialised countries lost their large, habitat specialist mammalian species in their zeal for economic growth. We need to follow their best practices and not mimic their mistakes.

The threat to tigers, especially fragmentation and loss of habitat has been increasing and continue to be the most serious of the problems in a country which constantly aims at nine per cent economic growth. Everyone is interested in biting a chunk of the tiger’s habitat; there is no distinction between urban or rural dwellers, rich or poor. Miners, road builders, even ‘green’ energy proponents are all in the race to snatch the tigers’ home.

Cats do not have nine lives to survive these irreversible damages. Tigers are crouching to survive despite this onslaught. Focusing to reverse these threats is important to ensure its long-term survival.

A recent publication by Joe Walston of Wildlife Conservation Society and others identified 18 important source sites for tigers in India. Of the identified 42 source sites across the world, India holds 43% of these sites. These areas need to be protected with the highest commitment if we are serious about saving the striped cat.

We lost tigers in Sariska and Panna Tiger Reserves and they precariously hold on in some. We need not construe that reintroduction of tigers to sites from where they have gone locally extinct is a solution to the problem. Emphasis on protection and enforcement are key to tiger’s survival and to develop tiger-permeable landscapes.

Encouraging signs

The other part of the celebrations during the release event was that Karnataka holds the highest tiger numbers tipping Madhya Pradesh from the top place. Do we need to celebrate that Karnataka holds the highest tiger numbers? Yes, we ought to be proud that we hold one of the largest tiger populations in the world. However in the larger perspective of tiger conservation, it is not encouraging that the other state has lost their tigers. If we had a sharp increase of tiger numbers in Karnataka it could have been a reason to celebrate.

The state has always had a distinction of prioritising and advocating protection to save its wildlife. We need to continue this strategy to ensure that the curtains on one of the magnificent species human kind has ever seen are not brought down.

What’s a source site?

Biologists have described source sites with a few indicators.

  • Sites that have higher densities of tigers in the landscape and have the potential to maintain demographically viable cluster of over 25 reproducing tigresses embedded in a larger terrain that could hold over 50 breeding females.
  • The landscapes that also have political, social and bureaucratic commitment to the area for long-term protection of tigers.
  • A legal framework that will support protection of tigers and their prey from hunting.
Source: Walston et al. 2010


An edited version of this article was published in Deccan Herald on 12-04-2011
http://www.deccanherald.com/content/152841/numbers-game.html